Engine Blueprinting (Part 1)

This term is routinely misused and misunderstood.

by Mike Mavrigian

While seasoned engine builders understand what the term “blueprinting” means, chances are most of their customers don’t. Too many neophytes think that balancing and blueprinting go hand-in-hand. They blindly assume that if the crank has been ­balanced, that must mean that the engine has been blueprinted.

If you scan your local newspaper’s automotive classified section, you’re bound to see three or four ads offering “blueprinted” engines. They may be part of a restored muscle car or they may be offered alone, but, nonetheless, there they are, in black and white.
In 99 percent of the cases, the ads are probably wrong. We’re not implying that 99 percent of the folks who placed the ads are lying. Instead, we think these folks are generally misguided. A blueprinted engine represents an enormous amount of highly skilled labor, usually far beyond the average enthusiast’s understanding or budget. Just as the term “turbocharged” has been abused (turbo sunglasses, turbocharged golf balls, etc.), such is the case with engine blueprinting.

Some enthusiasts consider an engine that’s been treated to a rebuild and balance as “blueprinted.” Their outlook may be that since they paid $2,000 or so for the rebuild, they’re entitled to use any label they deem appropriate in bragging about that particular motor, especially at the time of sale.

Engine blueprinting involves a specific list of specialty work that, in a nutshell, vastly increases the efficiency and durability of an engine.

The typical production engine represents a combination of cast, forged and machined components assembled in mass quantities, sometimes adhering to only the broadest interpretation of the original design spec. While the design of a small-block V8 may call for a perfectly identical dimension from the crank centerline to the deck surfaces along the entire length of each deck, mass-production reality dictates that vague proximity is close enough. While, in theory, all lifter bores in an OHV V-block should be perfectly spaced center-to-center and aligned to a specific centerline location relative to the cam lobes, again, the close-enough reality takes precedence.

Automakers have good intentions. They’d love to produce a perfect on-spec engine for every vehicle they create, but since tolerances exist due to the inherent dulling of milling bits, wearout of abrasive stones, and wear and calibration of machining equipment, the engine manufacturer must, out of necessity, tolerate a range of the design specifications. While some automakers are better at maintaining proximity to the intended spec than others, every automaker must accept the reality of the situation-building a “perfect” motor on a production basis is a very hard nut to crunch.

In the blueprinting program, our intent is to correct all of the large and small discrepancies within the entire scope of the engine assembly in an effort to arrive, as closely as possible, at a zero-resistance machine. This is no easy task, but it is approachable.

Blueprinting does not necessarily mean that we’ll pursue the “factory” spec; rather it means that we’ll pursue the most efficient operation for the engine in question. In some cases, that may be the OE spec, while in others, a newly developed spec may be more sensible.


Where corrective areas are addressed:
• Quality selection of the appropriate parts (block, heads, etc.)
• Positioning and alignment of the main bores in every axis, relative to the block casting as a whole
• Correction of the crankshaft’s main journal alignment and spacing, end play, rod journal alignment and spacing, stroke throw length and clock position of each throw
• Size and alignment of each cylinder bore relative to the corrected centerline of the crankshaft
• The plane and height of each deck relative to the corrected centerline of the crankshaft
• Correction of dynamic balance
• Diameter sizing of main and rod journals
• Bore sizing and equalization of each connecting rod in terms of center-to-center length, squareness and balance
• Piston skirt sizing, pin-centerline-to-dome ­verification and weight equalization
• Camshaft check/correction for shaft straightness, alignment, lobe spacing, clock position, ramp angles, lift heights, etc.
• Inspection of pushrods, lifters for length, diameter
• Inspection and equalization of cylinder head combustion chamber volume (modifications to chamber and/or dome required to achieve a specific total volume and compression ratio)
• Possible equalization of all intake valve and ­exhaust valve stem lengths, head diameters, weight
• Achieving a specific (and equal) valve seating depth at each valve
• Centerline-positioning, aligning and sizing each valve guide
• Achieving desired valve seat pressure
• Checking/achieving specific valvetrain geometry
• Improving efficiency of oiling system and cooling system
• Flaw inspection and strength improvement of all parts
• Checking all operation clearances (piston-skirt-to-crank counterweights, piston-to-wall, etc.)
• Checking and achieving a specific desired ­compression ratio
• Alignment of intake ports (head-to-manifold)

You can summarize the above list in one simple sentence: Never assume that any part is correct. Understand exactly what is required (the goal) in each and every component, and use the appropriate specialty fixtures and quality machinery to achieve that goal. Measure everything and assume nothing.

In a sense, you’re starting over from scratch, sometimes using the core materials that are available. Modify each part to arrive at your theoretical goal, instead of allowing an existing block or crank to dictate the quality of the assembly. Treat each part as “raw,” accepting the fact that you’ve only been given a starting point. If you can adopt that outlook, you can blueprint an engine. If you automatically assume that the automaker cast and machined a perfect block, you’re out of the game.

There are two practical reality levels of blueprinting. At the light end, you can correct the major areas (create a centered, aligned home for the crank; make sure the crank dimensions are correct; square the block decks and equalize their plane relative to the crank; balance the crank; match-balance the rods and pistons; correct lifter bore alignment; and equalize the heads’ combustion chambers). At the heavy end, you can nitpick every dimension of every part, every bolt and every gasket. The lighter approach will apply to streeters and out-of-pocket racers, while the heavy approach will apply only to the well-funded crowd.

While the procedure of blueprinting is an exact science, the approach may not be. Blueprinting is an ever-evolving realm where new and beneficial discoveries are taking place every day. In the grand effort to perfect the operation of the internal combustion engine, the blueprinter must keep an open mind.


A successful blueprint job is reliant on not only the corrective work involved, but the initial selection of each part in the very beginning. Naturally, since the goal is to create a maximum-efficiency motor, we want to avoid the use of inferior parts from the outset.
Toward this end, a strict program of flaw-detection is mandatory. Each and every part should be flaw-checked and inspected. The block must be checked for cracks and for cylinder wall thickness (use a sonic gauge for easy and reliable measurement of metal thickness), the crank and the connecting rods should be wet mag checked, and cylinder heads should be pressure-tested, at the very least.

It just doesn’t make sense to invest time and money in a part that you don’t know anything about. Your first order of business should be to weed out any potentially flawed parts before you begin the task of precision machining.

Also, choose the appropriate type of part for each situation. Consider the use of cast versus forged versus billet parts. Depending on the situation, the selection of an inherently stronger version of a part can dictate the difference between long-term success and short-term disaster.

In other words, invest some thought into the selection of parts that will be used. Blueprinting is time-consuming and it makes sense to use only the components that are appropriate for the application.


In many cases, the task of blueprinting can be eased by sifting through a number of production parts (here we include both OE and aftermarket) in an effort to locate the closest match to a specific need. For the sake of simplicity, let’s examine the needs of a “showroom stock” racer. This type of competitor is forced, via sanctioning body rules, to use an “unmodified” engine that meets OE spec. While the rules may not allow him to change engine specs, he can take advantage of having everything corrected to the “good” side of the tolerance range.

For example, once you know what the published cam specs are, you can then measure the existing cam. If that cam is off of spec to the detriment of performance (maybe lift isn’t as high as OE tolerance allows, for example), you might be able to find a better-performing cam by checking a few others of the same part number. The same goes for connecting rod lengths, block wall thicknesses, etc. If you’re presented with an engine that offers only limited machinability, compare a few identical parts in an effort to find the most suitable from a performance standpoint and then continue your allowable blueprinting corrective work.


In order to correct a given block, you’ll either need an array of specialty fixtures to conduct a blueprinting exercise or you’ll need to have access to a CNC machine. While some specialty tools and fixtures will apply generically to a number of engines (camshaft degreeing wheel, dial indicators, valve spring testers, etc.), you’ll need an array of fixtures that are dedicated to specific motors. However, by simple programming of a CNC machine, the same operations can be accomplished without the need to purchase these dedicated specialty machining fixtures.

Of course, honing plates are mandatory. These thick slabs of steel or aluminum are torqued to a block’s deck in order to simulate the stresses of an installed head. With this plate in place, the bores will be honed round when the block is distorted much closer to the conditions that the block will see during operation. Even though a block’s bores are honed perfectly round in a relaxed state, as soon as cylinder heads are installed, the bores will likely distort to an out-of-round condition.

Many experienced blueprinters go so far as to bolt on a variety of components to a block prior to honing, including not only deck plates, but bellhousing and motor mounts as well. The purpose: To create round cylinders when considering all potential bore distortion factors.

A camshaft line-boring fixture will allow you to ensure a cam bore tunnel that is perfectly parallel to the crank main bore. This consists of a series of bolt-together, precision-machined plates that correctly positions the cam tunnel boring bar relative to the crank mains.

If you don’t have access to a CNC machine, a block truing kit (again, each kit is dedicated to a specific block) allows you to correct a number of out-of-whack angle dimensions on the block itself, including twisted blocks, uneven deck clearance, bore angle, cam timing variation and intake manifold fit on V-blocks. Many factory blocks are machined using the oil pan rails as the major reference. A block-truing fixture will allow you to instead index everything from the crank centerline, a much more accurate method.

Again, if you don’t have access to a CNC machine, lifter bore accurizing is achieved with a special fixture that also indexes from the centerline of the crank. This type of fixture will consist of two face plates (one at the front of the block, one at the rear), indexed with a crank main bore bar and connected with a bridge plate that offers true positioning for the lifter bores. Using this bridge plate as a guide, the lifter bores are over-bored, creating an ideal centerline both in terms of centerline location but relative bore angle as well. Once the bores are centerline corrected, bronze sleeves are installed and resized for the lifters to be used. This machining process will create an ideal alignment and angle position for lifter-to-lobe contact.

A variety of additional fixtures exist, including bolt-on plates, to facilitate easier measuring of deck heights, plates that allow consistent (head-to-head) port matching of heads to intake manifolds, piston measurement stands, connecting rod length checkers, valve stem height indicators, V-block cylinder head-to-intake manifold angle checkers, tabletop fixtures that allow you to accurately measure center-to-center of timing sets, and much more.

We’ve only scratched the surface in this article. The detail involved in blueprinting one specific engine would take up more pages than we have available for this article.
Here, we’ve tried to present a basic understanding of what a blueprint involves. From an overall sense, the goal is to maximize the quality, fit and efficiency of every engine component, both in terms of an individual part and of the assembled engine.

In essence, blueprinting is the task of using existing parts as cores, in an effort to create an ideal model of efficiency and durability. It’s the fun of making things right and the ultimate exercise for those of us who simply refuse to believe that close enough is good enough. This is something that the customer needs to understand. A true blueprint job is an involved process that requires an excess of shop time and those customers who expect this extra level of perfection must be made to understand that shop time costs money. If they want to play, they’ve got to be willing to pay.

Tags: ,

  • randall

    wow i have never known about engine blueprinting its very interesting and has a very auspicious process.